• دعم MPN
Logo Logo
  • التحقيقات
  • الرأي والتحليل
  • كاريكاتير
  • المدونة الصوتية
  • أشرطة فيديو
  • لغة
    • 中文
    • русский
    • Español
    • English
    • Français
Sec. of Defense Robert McNamara indicates on a map where U.S. Navy aircraft made strikes at North Vietnamese PT boats and their shore bases in retaliation for the two attacks on American craft in the Gulf of Tonkin at a Pentagon news briefing, Aug. 5, 1964, Washington, D.C. The account came within hours of an announcement by Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson of the decision to hit back hard in reply to the attacks. (AP Photo)

Daniel Ellsberg: US Will Repeat Old Mistakes And It’s ‘Not Going To Eliminate ISIS’

WMDs: The Rhetoric Fueling The War On Terror And The Arab Spring

The “weapons of mass destruction” premise has proven to be a mere pretext for war. It has ultimately done little more than distract attention away from the death and destruction wrought by intervening forces.

يناير 22nd, 2015
Ramona Wadi
يناير 22nd, 2015
بواسطة Ramona Wadi
President Bush speaks at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tenn., on, July 12, 2004 where he his decision to invade Iraq even as he conceded on that investigators had not found the weapons of mass destruction. (AP/Mark Humphrey)

The weapons of mass destruction (WMD) premise has proven useful throughout the United States’ continued imperialist infiltration of the Middle East. Indeed, former President George W. Bush’s address to Congress on Sept. 20, 2001 can be read as a prelude to more recent intervention galvanized under the banner of democracy. In his address, Bush

اقرأ المقال كاملا

  • اتصل بنا
  • Archives
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
© 2026 MintPress News